Anti-Zionist Prime Directive: Do not harass Jews or Jewish institutions, regardless of their support for Israel. Harass includes blocking people’s path and defacing property. Harassment of Jews only strengthens Zionism and Israel by scaring Jews and making them want to move to Israel.
Anti-Zionist Prime Goal: To return the Western Jews back to Europe and also the Americas. Other Jews and miscellaneous sects, such as Sumerians should also be taken in, since the disastrous War on Terror and Western colonization of the Middle East has turned soured the once good relationship between Muslims and other People of the Book.
All humans come from one source (science and religion both agree except different origins). Dividing humans into different groups is arbitrary and wrong. Science has abandon the concept of race. Only species remain and we are all that one species. There is no chosen people. Jews can procreate with all other humans, and thus they are same species. It was wrong to view them as subhuman, but it is also wrong to view them as chosen above other people. That is how Nazis viewed themselves. It is wrong for Jews to carve out an ethnostate over existing populations. The Holocaust is not an excuse; two wrongs don't make a right. If snyone should be made to pay for the Holocaaust, it would be Germany, not the Middle East Those who really want to support Jews, should make them feal safe everywhere. Case in point, Donald J. Trump wants the Zionist vote (mostly from evangelical Christians), but then does not do much to oppose to anti-Jewish hate in The United States of America. Hate can be complicated. Zionism can have anti-Jewishism envolve with it. Many people wanted the Jews to leave their society and go to Israel and thus supported Isreael as a new kind of ghetto.
Dividing the world into countries and locking people into those countries is arbitrary. This is doubly so in the global economy where jobs can easily be moved across borders, but people often cannot. Most borders are new and/or have a history of fluctuation. For example, Poland was moved westward after World War II with the Soviet Union annexing eastern Poland and Poland annexing eastern Germany, and France and Germany has swap territory numerous times. Two world wars should have made the world realized how dangerous and wrong nationalism is, but instead, the United Nations repeat many of same kind of mistakes that the League of Nations made. It gave countries, which happen to be the most powerful at the time, permanent veto power in the Security Council, and continued the idea of nation thus partitioning British India into India / Pakistan and British Palestine into Israel and Palestine. The United Nations also merged Eritrea into Ethiopia, but Eritrea violently separated, so that too was a violent failure.
It is wrong to wage wars for geopolitical objectives. Evangelicals and Muslim extremists both are both eagerly plotting for a massive war in the Middle East. The Unites States is plotting to shift power from Iran to Saudi Arabia and instigating tensions for Israel (giving Jerusalem to Israel) is reminiscent of the wars of the 19th and 18th centuries that lead to the First World War. Do remember why the Crimean War was thought? Do you even remember the Crimean War? I mean the one that happened in the 1850's. That is how stupid and pointless it was. So many wars are forgotten, because their purpose is no longer relevant and/or was eclipse by much more disastrous wars. Not all wars are bad; at least not on the surface. The Korean War protected South Korea from being taken by North Korea who was an unprovoked aggressor and likewise for the First Persian Gulf War. But, the United States should not have given weapons to Saddam Hussein in the first place, and the United States should not have pushed Japan into opening up its society in the 1860's and making naval concessions in the 1920's (even though it was an ally) and picked sides in First World War which lead to the Second World War which lead to the partitioning of Korea.
War more often than not leads to more war and more injustices. War is not a substitute for good policies such as respecting your fellow humans and not acting like you are God or the chosen ones. To be clear, the United States had the "chosen ones attitude" (Manifest Destiny) before Zionist Jews did, and European Christians had the same attitude before the United States existed.
Ironically, the United States holds many of the keys to the solution, even though it is hell bent on destroying the world with pollution (walking away from the Paris Climate Accord) and wars. Many think they can get Jesus Christ to return by doing so. News flash, these idiots are not worthy, so they better not push their luck with salvation.
The simple solution would be to have one world government that will govern the whole world. History shows why this is dangerous. The Soviet Union was so bad, not because it was Marxist, but because it was so top-down in terms of power and control. The United States is scisming right now over nation-wide politics, because the Federal government has too much power over the states (ironically the Republican Party has turning away from its "states rights" stance and going back to its roots by instigating a second American Civil War). The proverb for all this is "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely".
When the Unite States was created, powers were divid between the national government and the stated. How much power was debated, and the founding fathers were divided on many things unlike how conservatives would like you to believe. Unfortunately, I have come to wish that conservatives were right about what the powers of Federal government should be. This will be a big problem. The founding fathers had to be locked into a stuffy room to force them to come to an agreement on the Constitution. Some set of universal rights must be establish for the whole world while having local governments administrate and make many laws within limits. Local governments should have military (thus the real meaning of the Second Amendment) that they lend to the world government just like the United States use to. This would prevent the world government from becoming powerful and tyrannical. Human rights will be protected like they were in the first American Civil War; the states would volunteer to fight the states that are infringing on human rights.
The European Union does hold some more answers with "The four freedoms of the Single Market". For the most part, the current global economy allows for goods, services, and capital to move freely across borders. But what is still mostly restricted is people being allowed to cross borders. This has created a system of arbitrage where people are trapped in developed countries and forced to pay high prices while their jobs are moved to developing countries where goods and services are made much cheaper. The market is not allowed to equalized by having people move to where opportunity and/or lower prices exist. The United sStates does not allow Mexicans to freely cross the border for jobs, but Mexico does not allow non-Mexicans to cross the border to own homes one lower priced land.